Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38412 (PNJ)

HAKAM @ JARRAH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/50274/2026 · 2026-09-11

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50274-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 HAKAM @ JARRA ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Farukh Abdullah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Additional AG, Haryana. VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition is the fourth petition filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 Cr.P.C.), seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.157 dated 25.06.2021, registered under Sections 332, 353, 186, 224, 225, 511, 427 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (corresponding to Sections 121, 132, 221, 262, 263, 62, 324(4) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023), Sections 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 3(2) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, at Police Station Sadar Tauru, District Nuh, during the pendency of the trial. 2. Criminal antecedents of the petitioner have not been explained in the petition. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars, if so advised. 4. Allowed as prayed for. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 11.09.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.09.11 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh