Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38406 (CAL)

P JAYA LAXMI v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

WPA/453/2026 · 2026-09-07

Biswaroop Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] *** WPA/453/2026 P.Jaya Laxmi Vs The Superintending Engineer and another Mr. U Partha Sarthi … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the respondents September 07, 2026 [AKB] Item No.11 1. Learned advocates for the parties are present. 2. This writ application is filed on the ground that the application made by the writ petitioner for grant of electricity connection marked at annexure P2 of the writ application is considered and decided by the respondent No.2, the Assistant Engineer, Electricity Department, Chouldari. 3. In the facts and circumstances this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping the writ application pending and directing respondents to file affidavits. 4. Thus this writ application stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent No. 2, Assistant Engineer, Electricity Department, Chouldari to consider and decide the application made by the writ petitioner for grant of electricity connection in accordance with law upon giving the writ petitioner and his learned advocate an opportunity of being heard within six weeks from the date of communication of this order. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)