1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] *** WPA/454/2026 Vijaya Raj Vs The Superintending Engineer and another Mr. R.Sanat … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the official respondents Mr. Arun S.Kumar … for the intervener September 07, 2026 [AKB] Item No.12 1. Learned advocate for the writ petitioner and learned advocate for the respondent Electricity Department are present. 2. Mr. Arun S. Kumar, learned advocate submits that his client intends to be added as party respondent in this writ petition as her right is involved. 3. In the facts and circumstances, Smt. Mathi be added as a party respondent in the writ application in course of this day. 4. As the application filed by the writ petitioner is to be considered and decided by the respondent No.2, no fruitful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending and directing respondents to file affidavits. 5. This writ application is disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application for electricity connection made by the petitioner marked annexure P1 of the writ application after giving opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner, Shri. Vijaya Raj and his learned advocate as well as respondent, Smt. Mathi who is added as a party respondent and pass a reasoned order. 2 6. Such decision shall be taken within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. 7. Thus the writ petition stands disposed of. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)