Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3840 (KAR)

CHAITALI B GULEDAGUDD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/35123/2024 · 2026-04-22

K V Aravind, S G Pandit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22060-DB WP No. 35123 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO.35123 OF 2024 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: CHAITALI B. GULEDAGUDD W/O. JAYANT K. MENASINAHAL AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS OCC: POLYTECHNIC LECTURER GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE MUNDGOD UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT EMPLOYEE NO.139077 R/AT NEAR VISHWANATH KALYAN MANTAP ADHYAPAKA NAGAR HUBBALLI-580 032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI G. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA DR B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22060-DB WP No. 35123 of 2024 PALACE ROAD, SESHADRI ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SHIVAREDDY, A.G.A.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2024 BEING PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.4001/2024 ON THE FILE OF KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, AT BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT THE RELIEF AS WAS BEING SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONER/APPLICANT IN IT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) This writ petition is listed for non-compliance of office objections for 7th time. This Court, on 16.02.2026 granted two weeks time finally to comply the office objection, subject to payment of cost payable to the Advocate’s Welfare Fund. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22060-DB WP No. 35123 of 2024 Today, Sri.Nataraj G., learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for further time to comply the office objections. There is no justification to grant further time. As the office objections are not complied with and cost, as ordered is also not paid, the writ petition stands rejected for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MPK CT:VC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4