Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3839 (AP)

KONERU VANI & 2 OTHERS v. KONERU SRINIVASU

FCA/131/2010 · 2026-06-23

Balaji Medamalli, D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010211022010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 131/2010 Between: 1. KONERU VANI & 2 OTHERS, W/O. SRINVIASU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 4, SAMBIREDDY BUILDINGS, NEAR JKC COLLEGE, 2. KONERU HARSHTA CHOUDARY,, D/O.SRINIVASU, BEING MINOR REP. BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN KONERU VANI. R/O. D.NO. 4, SAMBIREDDY BUILDINGS, NEAR JKC COLLEGE, 3. KONERU PRATEEK CHOUDARY,, S/O. SRINVIASU, BEING MINOR REP. BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN KONERU VANI. R/O. D.NO. 4, SAMBIREDDY BUILDINGS, NEAR JKC COLLEGE, ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. KONERU SRINIVASU, S/o. Bhaskara Rao, D.No. 13/256/A, Patimida, Gudivada Mandal, ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders to be urged at the time of hearing of the above FCA the appellant herein prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the FCA by modifying the Order and decree in G.W.O.P. No. 148 of 2008 on the file of the Judge, 2 Family Court-Cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Guntur dated 23-3-2010 and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. G V R CHOUDARY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. A CHAYA DEVI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the dismissal of G.W.O.P.No.148/2008 dated 23.3.2010 on the file of the Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Court, Guntur. 2. The said G.W.O.P. is filed under Section 45 of the Guardian and Wards Act for custody of minor children by removing the custody from wife and hand it over to husband/appellant. The said O.P was dismissed vide order dated 23.3.2010. On perusal of the order and also on perusal of the averments made in the appeal it reveals that from 2003 onwards there are disputes between the parties and they are living separately. Accordingly, it can be presumed that the children were born prior to 2003. In view of the same, now they would became majors. 3. Accordingly nothing survives to adjudicate in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH ___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 24.6.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 131 of 2010 24.6.2026 RD