Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3837 (KAR)

M/S SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, v. SRI. B V NARAYAN

RP/509/2025 · 2026-04-17

D K Singh, Venkatesh Naik T

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21294-DB RP No. 509 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REVIEW PETITION NO. 509 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI. K.R. RAVISHANKAR AND SMT. ANITHA RAVISHANKAR, VITTOBHA TEMPLE STREET, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 2. SRI. K.R. RAVISHANKAR, S/O K.C. RUDRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, C/O URVASHI THEATRE, NO.K-40, H. SIDDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560027. 3. SMT. ANITHA RAVISHANKAR, W/O K.R. RAVISHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, M/S SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, C/O URVASHI THEATRE, NO.K-40, H. SIDDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560027. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ANJALI M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21294-DB RP No. 509 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. B.V. NARAYAN S/O LATE B.R. VENKATARAMANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.100/24, 10TH 'D' MAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011. 2. SMT. JALAJA SHEKAR W/O LATE B.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 3. SRI. HEMANTH CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O LATE B.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. SRI. ANUP BANGALORE CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O LATE B.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.100/24, 10TH 'D' MAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 13.11.2025, ONE PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN RFA NO.1078/2024, BY EXERCISING THE POWER OF REVIEW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21294-DB RP No. 509 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the review petitioners has filed a memo dated 06.02.2026 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the review petition. Memo reads as under:- MEMO The petitioners submits as follows:- 1. The petitioners herein on 11.11.2025 has filed the current Review Petition seeking review of the order dated 13.10.2025 passed in R.F.A.No.1078/2024, subsequent to filing of the above Revision Petition the petitioners has filed Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.L.P.No.4035/2026, the Hon'ble Apex Court by order dated 30.01.2026 has passed an order which reads as hereunder:- "1. Issue notice, returnable on 16.03.2026. 2. Mr. Amit Pai, learned Advocate on Record, has entered caveat and accepts notice for Respondents. Hence, service of formal notice to the respondents is waived. 3. Let counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, be filed within two weeks after filing of the counter affidavit. 4. to the In the meanwhile, the time granted petitioners for handing over the vacant - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21294-DB RP No. 509 of 2025 possession of the subject premises is extended till the next date of hearing. 5. The petitioners is directed to deposit 50% of the mesne profit as directed by the High Court, within six weeks from today". 2. The said order came to be passed with notice to the Respondent. In that view of the matter the Petitioners be permitted to withdraw the above review petition to meet the ends of justice. 3. It is submitted that, the petitioners herein at the time of filing of the Review Petition has paid the requisite Court fee of Rs.88,856/- (Rs. Eighty- eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty-Six only) vide DD No.535259 dated 08.01.2026. However, as the petitioners herein are willing to withdraw the current petition, the petitioners herein humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to refund the requisite Court Fee of Rs.88,856/- to meet the ends of justice and Equity. (sic) 2. In view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the review petitioners, the review petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE MNList No.: 1 Sl No.: 7