CRM-M-32117-2026 -1- 275 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32117-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Harsh Tanwar and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Pardeep Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. A report dated 28.07.2026 has been received from District and Sessions Judge, Ambala. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has made a statement at Bar that the said respondent has no objection if the FIR in question and all its consequential proceedings qua the petitioners are quashed. 3. In view thereof and for contents of the petition in question as VISHNU 2026.09.10 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-32117-2026 -2- well as the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 today in the Court, FIR Annexure P-1 and all its consequential proceedings qua the petitioners are quashed. 4. Petition is disposed off accordingly. Interim application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off. [ RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ] 10.09.2026 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VISHNU 2026.09.10 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh