APM INDUSTRIES LTD. v. CENTRAL GROUND WATER AUTHORITY
CW/4332/2026 · 2026-03-16
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3836 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3836 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4332/2026 Apm Industries Ltd., Through Authorised Signatory/ Managing Director, Sp-147, Riico Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan, India- 301019 ----Petitioner Versus
1. Central Ground Water Authority, Through Its Member Secretary, Ministry Of Jal Shakti, Csmrs Campus, O1Of Palme Marg, Hauz Khas, New Delhi- 110016, Also At Central Ground Water Authority, (Regional Office- Rajasthan), Central Ground Water Board, Western Region, 6-A, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur 302004, Rajasthan
2. Union Of India, Through Its Joint Secretary, Ministry Of Jal Shakti, Department Of Water Resources, River Development And Ganga Rejuvenation, Government Of India, Cr Section, Room No 224, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi- 110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Alok Garg with Ms. Swati Daga Ms. Anima Chaturvedi for Mr. Bharat Vyas, ASG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 16/03/2026 After arguing the matter at some length, counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is allowed to raise objections by submitting a written representation to the respondents as regards the impugned demand of Rs.43,53,350/- and the respondents consider its objections and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order.
[2026:RJ-JP:11077] (2 of 2) [CW-4332/2026]
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have no objection in case the petitioner raises objection as regards the impugned demand and they will also consider and decide the objections if submitted by the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order. In view of the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts of the case, this Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the petitioner is allowed to make objection/representation to the respondents as regards the impugned demand. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to submit the objection/representation to the respondents as regards the impugned demand within a period of 7 days from today. In case the respondents receive any objection/representation as regards the impugned demand within the given time, they shall consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 21 days thereafter. Till the respondents decide the objection/representation, if submitted by the petitioner, the respondents shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /52