Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15720
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1152 of 2022 Radha Bai Anant W/o Shri Dhanaram Anant, Aged About 62 Years R/o Rasauta, Post Rasauta, Ward No. 11, Police Station And Tahsil Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Accountant General, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Zero Point, Balodabazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. The Joint Director, Urban Administration And Development Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
4. The District Treasury Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner
: Mr. K.K. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Government Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07.04
.2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, directing the respondent authorities to release all the dues relating to service of petitioner's husband in favour of petitioner, forthwith, with interest, in accordance with law. 10.1 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.04.07 14:27:02 +0530
2 case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”
2. The husband of the petitioner, namely, Dhanaram Anant was Lower Division Clerk in the Office of District Treasury, Bilaspur and he has been missing since 1980. The petitioner/wife of the Government servant has filed this petition to release and disbursement of retiral dues.
3. Mr. Keshav Gupta, Government Advocate appearing for the State would submit that according to prevailing rules, the petitioner was required to lodge FIR and after expiry of one year from said date, he would be entitled to receive all retiral dues.
4. At this stage, Mr. Pandey would submit that FIR was lodged on 30.03.2025 and one year has already expired.
5. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Pandey, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to release and disburse admissible retiral dues to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of 60 days from today.
6. With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant