IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5608 of 2026 ====================================================== Jitani Devi W/o Late Jeetan Sharma, Resident of Village - Jirwa Madhaili, Ward No. 2, P.S. and Anchal - Shankarpur, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4. The Circle Officer, Shankarpur, District - Madhepura. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Madhepura. 6. The Officer-in-Charge, Shankarpur P.S., District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Advocate (08) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2026 Heard Mr. Rupesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “I. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents to remove all illegal encroachments from the petitioner's land and restore full possession. II. Further direct the District Magistrate of Madhepura and Circle Officer, Shankarpur, to conduct fresh demarcation of the land in question Patna High Court CWJC No.5608 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 and ensure possession. III. Further direct the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura, to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and to act upon her written complaints. IV. Further direct the authorities to dispose of the petitioner's pending representations within a time-bound manner. V. Pass any other relief/s or order/s as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she shall be approaching the appropriate authority/competent Court for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority/competent Court. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U