03.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.275. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 1769 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station case no. 231 of 2026 dated 03.03.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Tufan Das ……Petitioner. Mr. Sumanta Das .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Aditya Tiwari ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for about six months, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court and the genesis of the dispute is differences of opinion amongst the local persons. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that injuries are grievous and the vital assaults were inflicted by the present petitioner upon the injured. There is an incise wound at the back and grievous injury at the occipital region and the offences are grievous. Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and as prosecution is pursuing to trace out the other accused persons, some time will be required for progress of the trial. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed on some stringent conditions. 2 As such, the petitioner, namely, Tufan Das shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnanagar, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction of Kotwali police station and will meet the Officer-in-Charge/Inspector In-Charge of the jurisdictional police station where the petitioner would be residing till the further order of this Court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) No. 1769 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)