Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38334 (PNJ)

HARNEK SINGH v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

CRM-M/51120/2026 · 2026-09-10

Shalini Singh Nagpal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRM-M-51120-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRM-M-51120-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 HARNEK SINGH PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Ms. Amarinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Viren Sibal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. The petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 seeks following reliefs: i) Direction to official respondents to take legal action against respondents No.4 and 5. ii) Direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 28.07.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was cheated of a sum of ₹3,00,000/- by private respondents on the pretext of sending her son abroad. Petitioner’s son was neither sent abroad nor the money was returned. Representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-4), in this regard was moved to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh for registration of FIR but no action was taken thereon. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. Mr. Viren Sibal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of official respondents and submits that the representation was received and was under process. HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document 2 CRM-M-51120-2026 (O&M) 5. In view of the prayers made by the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to decide the aforesaid representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexures P-4), by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of 15 days from today and take necessary action as per law, if so required. 6. In case, official respondents do not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation (Annexure P-4), the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 10.09.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document