Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38331 (CHH)

AKHILESH SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4568/2022 · 2026-10-05

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010348972022 2026:CGHC:43258 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4568 of 2022 1 - Akhilesh Soni S/o Ramlakhan Aged About 49 Years Elected Member Of Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Lakhanpur, Registration No. 1710, R/o Village Korja, District - Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur (C.G.) 2 - Banarasi Ram S/o Govind Ram Aged About 61 Years Elected Member Of Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Raghunathpur, Registration No. 1696, R/o Village Uchdih, District Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Co-Operativ Affairs, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Co-Operative Election Commission Through Its Commissioner, Raipur Mahila Thana Chowk, Chhotapara, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Surguja, Division Surguja, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Registrar / Registration Officer Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, Surguja Registration No. 1610, Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Managing Director/ Appellate Authority Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, Surguja, Headquarter Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Thadesh Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Manish Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 & 3/State : Shri Vivek Siddharth, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Samidha Karamkelkar, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2026.10.08 13:26:41 +0530 2 S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/10/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the grievance raised in the present petition has already been redressed and, accordingly, the petition has been rendered infructuous. He, therefore, prays that the present petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. 2. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Kamde