03.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 281. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1777 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Manikchak Police Station Case No. 648/2025 dated 21.08.2025 under Section 69/88/89/91/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Tapan Ghosh ……Petitioner. Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen ….for the defacto complainant. Mr. Rajdeep Biswas Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than 5 months. Charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. State has produced the case diary and referred to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have 2 taken into account the said statement. I find that the statement starts with a 7 year relationship. Having considered that charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court, I am of the opinion further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Tapan Ghosh shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Malda. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Malda without the prior permission of the learned Court. Petitioner shall report to the Officer-in- Charge/Inspector-in-Charge of the local police station where the petitioner would be residing, once in every 10 days and obtain an acknowledgment. Learned Court in seisin of the case would ensure that a copy of the acknowledgment is submitted before the Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1777 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. 3 All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)