IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64165 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1867 Year-2021 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vijay Sah S/o Rajendra Sah R/o Village_ Badi Maliya, P.S.- Gogari, DIstt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Arvind Kumar Pankaj S/o- Late Jageshwar Chaurasiya Asst. Branch Manager, Sarvoday Proficient Fund Ltd. Ravi Ranjan Market Arya Samaj Road Old Post office Road Samastipur W.No- Ps Dist- Samastipur, R/o- West Girls High School Kushipur Samastipur Ps Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 16-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 179 of 2019 (Complaint Case No. 1867 of 2021) registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 04.04.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 22927 of 2024 by this Court, which reads as follows:- Heard learned cousnel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64165 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 179 of 2019 (Complaint case No. 1867 of 2021) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The petitioner is a member of Board of Directors of Nidhi Company and the company was collecting money, though, the Nidhi Company was not authorized by the Central Government. The Company of which the petition is a member of Board and he is accused of misappropriating about Rs. 2 corers which may increase, if the case is investigated properly. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2023. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents. 5. In view of the aforesaid fact, This Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith. 6. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases in one court pending against the petitioner. 4. Thereafter, the petitioner moved before the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide SLP (Crl) No(s). 8579 of 2024 which was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 18.07.2024. 5. In the trial, all the witnesses have been examined and the final argument is to begin on the next date of hearing. 6. In view of the above, this application for regular bail stands rejected. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T