Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
15.
15. 02.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 21675 OF 2026 AKASH RUIDAS VS.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Md. Apzal Ansari, Adv. Mr. Pradip Ruidas, Adv. …For Petitioner Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Arijit Bakshi, Adv. …For State
1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.
2. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that approach was made to jurisdictional Magistrate for ensuring proper investigation of Pandabeswar P.S. Case no.127 of 2026 dated 17th June, 2026. However, it is further submitted on behalf of petitioner that such application made before the jurisdictional Magistrate was rejected.
3. If prayer of petitioner made before the jurisdictional Magistrate is rejected by passing an order, in that event, petitioner is required to take steps, in accordance with law.
4. Propriety of the order passed by court below ought not to be delved into in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution.
5. Hence, present writ petition is not entertained and same stands dismissed.
6. However, this order shall not preclude petitioner to take steps, in accordance with law.
2
7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
(SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)