(MRS.) SHANTI AMBASHT v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPCR/570/2026 · 2026-10-05
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Shri Sudhir Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38302 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38302 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010391282026
2026:CGHC:43148-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 570 of 2026 1 - (Mrs.) Shanti Ambasht W/o. Late. Satyanarayan Ambasht Aged About 70 Years R/o. Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 2 - Vivek Ambasht S/o. Late Satyanarayan Ambasht Aged About 36 Years R/o. Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. (Younger-Son) 3 - (Mrs.) Barkha Shrivastava W/o. Rakesh Shrivastava Aged About 43 Years R/o. House No. 172, Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. (Married-Daughter). 4 - Aditya Shrivastava S/o. Rakesh Shrivastava Aged About 18 Years R/o. House No. 172, Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. (Maternal Grand-Son).
... Petitioners versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur C.G. 2 - The Superintendent Of Police District Sarguja C.G. 3 - The S.H.O. P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. 4 - The S.H.O. P.S. A.J.K., District Sarguja C.G. 5 - Yugeshwari Ekka @ Aarushi D/o. Babulal Ekka R/o. Baikunthpur, District Koriya C.G., Presently R/o. Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. 6 - Vijay Ambasht S/o. Late Satyanarayan Ambasht Aged About 40 Years R/o. Kedarpur Bhatti Road, P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. (Petitioner No. 1's Elder-Son).
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Soni and Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocates. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Panel Lawyer. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas &
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Sudhir Kumar
Order on Board 06.10.2026 Per
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty as per law.
2. Learned State counsel has no objection.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as per law. Sd/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Rajshekhar