312 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: September 10, 2026 (i) CR-2598-2006 Sohan Lal …Pe22oner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent * * * * (ii) CR-2599-2006 Sohan Lal …Pe22oner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the peoner. Mr. Harshit Singh, AAG, Haryana. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) There is no representaon on behalf of the peoner. The maer was admied way back on 20.08.2007 and has been listed today a&er a long interregnum. 2. Both the revision peons have been filed by the decree holder against the order dated 10.12.2025 passed by the Execung Court, whereby his execuon peon was dismissed, giving him liberty to file a fresh execuon, in case there was any clerical mistake in calculang the amount in terms of the Award dated 12.11.1992. 3. Considering the aforesaid factual posion, parcularly when nobody is appearing on behalf of the peoner, both the peons are dismissed in default, with liberty to the peoner to get it revived, in case any cause of acon sll survives. SARITA RANI 2026.09.10 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2598 and CR-2598 of 2006 - 2 - 2026:PHHC:128251 4. Copy of this order be sent to the peoner on his last available address. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file. September 10, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.09.10 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document