Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (SA No. 561 of 2018)
CGHC010304262018
2026:CGHC:43273
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 561 of 2018 1 - Rukmani Bai D/o Lalsingh Gond Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 2 - Senduka Bai D/o Lalsingh Gond Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh......(Palaintiffs)
--- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Narayan S/o Lalsingh Gond Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chouhan Singh S/o Lalsingh Gond Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 3 - Suvita S/o Lalsingh Gond Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 4 - Daimati Wd/o Late Lalsingh Gond Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Gangrajpur, Tahsil Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgrah......(Defendants)
--- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.10.07 17:30:11 +0530
2 (SA No. 561 of 2018) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :- None in two rounds. For State/ Respondent No.5 :- Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB -
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Judgment On Board
06.10.2026
1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 30.07.2018 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Gariyaband, District – Gariyaband in Civil Appeal No.02A/2017.
2. Even on the second call, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, nor was any representation made on her behalf. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge @d!t!