Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38290 (CAL)

SAIDUL BISWAS @ NATA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1762/2026 · 2026-09-03

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.09.2026 Serial no. 270 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1762 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Duttapukur Police Station case no. 701 of 2025 dated 22.09.2025 u/s 126(2)/117(2)/109/303(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Saidul Biswas @ Nata … Petitioner(s) Ms. Sanghamitra Nandy … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arindam Banerjee … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Kajal Mukherjee Mr. Bikash Chakrbaorty Mr. Sudipto Kr. Basu … for the defacto-complainant Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 10th June, 2026 and since then he is in custody. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that a lawyer and his son have been severely assaulted when they tried to enter into a petrol pump. Learned advocate added that there were severe injuries, but, inspite of the same, the investigating officer behaved in a different manner. State has submitted a report which reflects that in charge-sheet, Section 109 of the BNS has been dropped. 2 Having considered that rest of the offences are of Magistrate triable; the petitioner is in custody for 84 days and charge-sheet has already been submitted, I am of the opinion that the petitioner may be released on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Saidul Biswas @ Nata shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Barasat. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1762 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3