Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3829 (CAL)

SANIDUL SK @ ROSUL SK @ RASEL SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/306/2026 · 2026-02-19

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.02.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 53. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 306 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No. 579 of 2024 dated 01.06.2024 under sections 395/397/412/109/120B/202/212 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 13/14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. And In the matter of : Sanidul Sk. @ Rosul Sk. @ Rasel Sk. ……Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Anisur Rahaman Mr. Avik Ghosh ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Antarikhya Basu Ms. Rajnandini Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year and 8 months and out of 26 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 16 witnesses have already been examined. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner was identified in the T.I. Parade and there has been recovery from the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody for a considerable period of time. Learned Trial Court is directed to fix a schedule of 3 dates once in a month and conclude the trial at the earliest. 2 Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. With the aforesaid directions CRM (M) 306 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)