Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38278 (CAL)

SUBHAJIT SARKAR @ SUBHA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1761/2026 · 2026-09-03

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.09.2026 Serial no. 269 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1761 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Jamboni PS Cse No. 03 of 2026 dated 06.01.2026 u/s 309(6)/310(2)/317(3) of BNS, 25(1)(a)/25(6) of the Arms Act. -And- In the matter of : Subhajit Sarkar @ Subha … Petitioner(s) Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Santanu Maji … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu Mr. Neel Chakraborty … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 13.01.2026 and no incriminating materials have been recovered from him. According to the learned advocate, the petitioner was not identified in the T.I. parade, as such, he may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the sketch map of the place of occurrence was seized from the present petitioner. So far as the materials relating to the offence are concerned, nothing has been recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner was not placed in the T.I. parade and his role in the commission of offence is completely different so far as the other three accused persons are concerned who have been identified in the T.I. parade. 2 Having considered the period of detention and the complicity of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Subhajit Sarkar @ Subha shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Jhargram. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Jhargam without prior permission of the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1761 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3