CWP-28327-2026 [1] 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28327-2026 Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Parvesh Devi and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. In the head note of the petition, following prayers have been made:- “CIVIL WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA for the issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to forthwith execute title deeds/gift deeds in favour of the Petitioners in respect of the 100 square yard residential plots finally allotted to them under the Mukhya Mantri Gramin Awas Yojana (Extension)/MMGAY-2.0, pursuant to the draw of lots duly conducted on 24.01.2025, the same not having been done despite the finalisation of the names of the Petitioners and despite the express instructions dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-8) of the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Haryana, PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.07 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-28327-2026 [2] Housing for All Department, directing execution of gift deeds; AND/OR FURTHERMORE, for the issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to decide the legal notice dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-9) served by the Petitioners by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time-bound manner; AND/OR FURTHERMORE, for issuance of any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Gram Panchayat, Village Sohati had passed a Resolution No.1 dated 21.03.2025 in pursuance of memo dated 20.02.2025 vide which the Chief Executive Officers, Zila Parishads were directed to implement the Mukhya Mantri Gramin Awas Yojna-2.0 and in pursuance of the same, land measuring 7.97 acres was identified to be allotted to eligible persons. It is submitted that the said Resolution had been passed in compliance of “Housing For All” Scheme of the Government of Haryana and every poor person was to be provided with the house of 100 square yards. It is further submitted that the petitioners are eligible under the said Scheme and were also successful in draw of lots, however till date they have not been allotted plots. It is submitted that for the grievance raised by the petitioners, legal notice dated 27.07.2026 has been issued and would be satisfied, at this stage, in case final decision on the said legal notice is taken with respect to each of the petitioners after giving opportunity of hearing to them or their PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.07 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-28327-2026 [3] representatives. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that in the present case, although decision is to be taken by respondent No.2 but respondent No.2 would also need assistance of respondent Nos.3 and 5 and thus, would also be required to hear them before final decision is taken. It is submitted that adequate time be granted to respondent No.2 as there are 136 petitioners. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances and fair stand taken on behalf of the petitioners as well as respondents-State, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide legal notice dated 27.07.2026 by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from today after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their representatives. In case, respondent No.2 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioners are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioners expeditiously. 5. It would be open to respondent No.2 to take assistance of respondent Nos.3 and 5 and also hear to them before any final decision is taken. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE 03.09.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.07 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document