IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CWP No.10342 of 2026 (O&M) Date of decision: September 3rd, 2026 Dharampal Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Rishabh Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. A perusal of the paper book would show that an earlier order dated 13.02.1997 was passed which is stated to be against the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner and a reference of which has been made in Annexure P-1. The same has not been annexed along with the present paper book. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after placing on record the order dated 13.02.1997 as also the application filed under Section 7 of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 and the reply filed by the petitioner thereto. The petitioner would also place on record the original order dated 25.01.1994 passed in the said proceedings under PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.07 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Section 7 of the 1961 Act. 3. Disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 3rd, 2026 (DIVYA SHARMA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.07 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh