Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38249 (KAR)

SMT KUSHALA DHANANJAYA v. MR MAHESHWARA RAO IAS

CCC/642/2025 · 2026-09-07

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010368802025 NC: 2026:KHC:48329-DB CCC No. 642 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAAT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 642 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. KUSHALA DHANANJAYA W/O. DHANANJAYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT. NO.101, “SAINIVAS APARTMENT” 3RDMAIN, GANGOTHRI ENCLAVE GUBBALA GATE, BANGALORE-560 062. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR.K.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MR. MAHESHWARA RAO., I.A.S., THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 002. 2. MR. CHAMARAJA THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, KENGERI SUB-DIVISION, HEMMIGEPURA WARD, KENGERI, BANGALORE-560 060. 3. SMT. NIRMALA BASAVARAJU W/O BASAVARAJU, AGED MAJOR, R/AT. NO.53, 6THCROSS, RAGHUVANAHALLI, Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010368802025 NC: 2026:KHC:48329-DB CCC No. 642 of 2025 MANJUNATHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 062. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN REDDY K.S., ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A2; SRI. NAGARAJ HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR A3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL VIOLATING AND DISOBEDIENCE OF THE COURT INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.03.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRITPETITIONNO.4898/2025(LB-BMP) AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Even today, no one appears for the complainant. 2. This case is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 20.03.2025, passed by the writ court, whereby the respondent / accused No.3 was restrained from putting up any further construction till the next date. It has not been demonstrated that the restraint on the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010368802025 NC: 2026:KHC:48329-DB CCC No. 642 of 2025 accused has been extended by the writ Court on subsequent dates of listing. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent / accused No.3 states that the writ petition is still pending. 4. The learned counsel for the BBMP states that it is a B-Khata property and therefore no plan has been sanctioned. He states that appropriate action shall be taken in accordance with law. 5. This contempt petition is consigned. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9