- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272202018 NC: 2026:KHC:48191 WP No. 32072 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 32072 OF 2018 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SRI N. NAGARAJU S/O LATE NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NO.517, 2ND CROSS, KAMATAGERI NAZARBAD MOHALLA, MYSORE 570 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V M PRASAD, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560001 2. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGLAURU 560 001 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401 Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272202018 NC: 2026:KHC:48191 WP No. 32072 of 2018 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, K.R.S. ROAD, MYSURU-570 016 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. POOJA M. KOORSE, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 SRI P.V. CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 19.01.2010 IN CI-666-SPQ-2007 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 3(1) (STATED AS SECTION 18(3)(1) IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE PETITION) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966 AND ALSO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 I.E., UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEXURES-A AND B RESPECTIVELY AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE AFORESAID ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN THE AFORESAID ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS STOOD LAPSED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010272202018 NC: 2026:KHC:48191 WP No. 32072 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner though the case is called twice in the day. Even on the last date, there was no appearance for the petitioner. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70