Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38243 (PNJ)

HARPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/11105/2026 · 2026-09-11

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-11105-2026 1 117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-11105-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 HARDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Dolli Sharma, Advocate, and Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/2327 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8 and not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 07.09.2026 (Annexure P-3) was also made to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, District Jalandhar, Punjab, for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-11105-2026 2 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of Official respondents. 5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. 6. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 11.09.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document