Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38241 (CAL)

NITYA GOPAL PAL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22193/2025 · 2026-08-31

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31.08.2026 Sl. No.12 Ct. No.14 gd IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/22193/2025 Nitya Gopal Pal VS The State of West Bengal and Ors. Ms. Rama Halder …for the Petitioner. Mr. Sourav Sengupta Mr. Asit Kumar De …for the State. 1. Report filed by the State furnished by Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal dated 31st August, 2026 is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction upon the respondent authorities, particularly respondent no.2, Commissioner of School Education to give approval of appointment to the petitioner immediately. 3. Mr. Sourav Sengupta, learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the Commissioner of School Education has reported that approval of appointment of the petitioner has already been accorded. 4. Ms. Rama Halder, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner concedes to the same. 5. In view of the above, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition being WPA 22193 of 2025 stands disposed of. 7. All consequential steps be taken by the respondent authorities in accordance with law. 8. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 10. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 11. There shall be no order as to costs. 12. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 13. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.) 2