2026:JHHC:1050 --1-- Criminal Revision No. 97 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 97 of 2024 ---- Durga Charan Samad, aged about 37 years, S/o Narayan Samad, resident of village – Turamdih, PO – Hesalkuti, PS – Toklo, District – Singhbhum West, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shanti Laguri, W/o Durga Charan Samad, D/o Yogesh Nandan Laguri, aged about 26 years, resident of village – Ruiya Sangisai, PO – Ruiya, PS – Jhinkpani, District – Singhbhum West, Jharkhand .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Nawin Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Arvind Prajapati, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate For O.P. No.2 :- Mr. S.K. Vishwakarma, Advocate ---- 15/15.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2. 2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in Original Maintenance Case No.53 of 2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. whereby the learned Court has been pleased to direct interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the wife, who is opposite party No.2. 2026:JHHC:1050 --2-- Criminal Revision No. 97 of 2024 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that now a good sense has prevailed between the parties and both the sides have compromised the matter and the compromise petition has been filed in the form of I.A. No.6627 of 2025. He further submits that one time settlement has reached between the parties and it has been decided that the petitioner will handover bank draft of Rs.4 lacs in favour of the opposite party No.2. He then submits that he has come forward along with bank draft of Rs.4 lacs in the name of opposite party No.2. He next submits that they have mutually agreed to take divorce. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that it appears that compromise is there in light of I.A. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 submits that one time settlement has reached between the parties and he has got instruction to take said bank draft of Rs.4 lacs and handover the same to the opposite party No.2. He further submits that in light of one time settlement the opposite party No.2 will not claim further maintenance. 6. In the Court’s proceeding the said bank draft of Rs.4 lacs has been handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 and the learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 will handover the same to the opposite party No.2. 2026:JHHC:1050 --3-- Criminal Revision No. 97 of 2024 7. In view of the above, the prayer made in the I.A. is hereby allowed and disposed of and the case is hereby allowed to be compromised. 8. This criminal revision petition is disposed of in terms of compromise. 9. Pending petitions, if any, are also disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 15.01.2026 Sangam/