Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38233 (MAD)

m/S. Atmarati Architects v. The Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise

WP/22159/2026 · 2026-06-22

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22159 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22159 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.24046 and 24051 of 2026 M/S. Atmarati Architects (Legal name Auroville Foundation) Represented by its Unit Executer Eluoard Pierre, 34, Raja Singh Street, Puducherry -605 001. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise Puducherry Division, Puducherry. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records of the Respondent in the Impugned Order No.06 / 2023 -GST bearing DIN 20230359XQ0000591110 FY 2017-20 dated 28.02.2023 vide GSTIN 34AAATA0037BDZD along with consequential summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 bearing a Ref No. ZD340523000003C dated 02.05.2023 for the Year 2017- 21 and quash the same as it is being contrary to the provision of CGST Act, 2017. For Petitioner: Mr.S. Kannan Mr.Vignesh Kumar.K For Respondent: Mr.Rajendran Raghavan, Senior Standing Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22159 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER Orders dated 28.02.2023 and 02.05.2023 are impugned primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Mr.Rajendran Raghavan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 100% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 100% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 100% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 22.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22159 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To The Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise Puducherry Division, Puducherry. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22159 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 22159 of 2026 22.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis