Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38230 (MAD)

Munesh Interlinings v. The State Tax Officer

WP/22083/2026 · 2026-06-19

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22083 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22083 of 2026 AND WMP Nos. 23966 & 23968 of 2026 Munesh Interlinings Rep. by its proprietrix, Kamlesh Jain, Old No.42, New No.58, Mezzanine Floor, Rottigidnagu Thiruvengada Mudali Street, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600112. ..Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer (commercial tax officer), Choolai Assessment circle, Greenways Road, Chennai 06, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in his proceeding in FORM GST DRC- 07 with Reference No.ZD330225081817A dated 08.02.2025, along with a detailed order in GSTIN/33ABKPJ5200A1ZH/2020-21 dated 07.02.2025 for the tax period APR 2020 - MAR 2021 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B Syed Abdul Wakeel For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel O R D E R An order imposing late fee and penalty is challenged in this Writ Petition. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22083 of 2026 2.As regards penalty, learned counsel relies on the judgment of this Court in Kandhan Hardware to contend that the imposition of late fee is penal in nature and, therefore, penalty cannot be imposed after imposing a late fee. With regard to late fee, he submits that the computation thereof is not in accordance with Section 47 (2) in as much as more than quarter percent of the turnover has been imposed. Without prejudice, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 100% of the late fee as a condition for remand. 3.In order to maintain consistency in approach, following Kandhan Hardware, the impugned order is set aside partly in so far as penalty is concerned. Subject to payment of 100% of the late fee as a condition for remand, the order is also set aside as regards late fee and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within a period of three months from the date of remittance of 100% of the late fee. 4.The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 19-06-2026 Index: No Speaking order Neutral Citation: No GSA __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22083 of 2026 To The State Tax Officer (commercial tax officer), Choolai Assessment circle, Greenways Road, Chennai 06, Tamil Nadu. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22083 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. GSA WP No. 22083 of 2026 AND WMP Nos. 23966 & 23968 OF 2026 19-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis