Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) No. 367 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Himanshu alias Harsh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge March 24, 2026 (shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?