Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38226 (MAD)

Anbazhagan v. State rep.by

CRL OP/15595/2026 · 2026-06-22

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 Anbazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, Inspector of Police, C-2, Periyapalayam Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Cr.No.2 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) To modify the condition in Para No.5(1) the petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) along with two sureties. Both the sureties should be a permanent resident within the jurisdiction of Thiruvallur District amongst which one shall be the blood surety for above sum in Crl.MP.No.102 of 2026 on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukottai dated 18.05.2026 and to allow the above criminal original petition. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Amarnath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to modify the condition in Para No.5(1), in order dated 18.05.2026 in Crl.MP.No.102 of 2026 on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukottai. 2. The petitioner is the owner of Ashok Leyland Goods Carrier Vehicle, which was seized by the respondent Police. The petitioner filed return of property petition in Crl.MP.No.102 of 2026. The Trial Court by order dated 18.05.2026 granted interim custody of the vehicle with certain conditions and one of the condition is that the petitioner shall execute a bond of Rs.5,00,000/- along with two sureties and both the sureties should be a permanent resident within the jurisdiction of Tiruvallur, amongst which one shall be the blood surety. 3. The contention of the petitioner is that the said vehicle itself is valued only Rs.3,00,000/-. However the Lower Court, while ordering interim custody, has imposed a condition direction the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, which is onerous. Hence he is unable to furnish the requisite surety. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- as condition for interim custody of the said vehicle. 5. Considering the above submissions, this Court modifies condition No.5(1) in Crl.MP.No.102 of 2026 on the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukottai to the following extent: “The petitioner shall execute a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) along with two sureties. Both the sureties should be a permanent resident within the jurisdiction of Tiruvallur District. Amongst which one shall be the blood surety for the above sum.” 6. The other conditions imposed in the order 18.05.2026 in Crl.MP.No.102 of 2026 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukottai, remain unaltered. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 22-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PVS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukottai 2. The Inspector of Police, C-2, Periyapalayam Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Cr.No.2 of 2026. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. PVS CRL OP No. 15595 of 2026 22-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis