Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3822 (AP)

T Tejaswini v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5139/2026 · 2026-06-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : nil Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010320772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5139/2026 Between: 1. T TEJASWINI, W/O. L. RAVI PRAKASH,AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.407,BSP COLONY, MOTI NAGAR,HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500114. 2. L RAVI PRAKASH, S/O. L. KONDAMA NAIDUAGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.407,BSP COLONY, MOTI NAGAR,HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500114. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF A.P, NELAPADU,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. N DIMPU SRI, W/O. T. TARUN,AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.87/1285/6-1OOAKURNOOL TOWN, SOMISETTY NAGAR- 2,KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518001. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to QUASH Crime No.48 of 2026 dated 07.06.2026 for the offences under Sections 85, R/w 3(5) of BNS and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the file of the SHO, Mahila UPS, Kurnool, P.S. Kurnool District, against the Petitioners/Accused No.4 and 5 herein and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to DISPENSE with the filing of the certified copy of the F.I.R in Crime No.48 of 2026 on the file of the SHO, Mahila UPS, Kurnool, P.S., Kurnool District in the present CRLP filed seeking to quash Crime No.48 of 2026 dated 07.06.2026 for the offences under Sections 85, R/w 3(5) of BNS & Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the file of Mahila UPS, Kurnool, Kurnool District, against the Petitioners/Accused No.4 and 5 herein and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY all further proceedings in Crime No.48 of 2026 dated 07.06.2026 for the offences under Sections 85, R/w 3(5) of BNS & Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the file of the SHO, Mahila UPS, Kurnool, P.S., Kurnool District against the Petitioners/Accused No.4 and 5 herein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5139/2026 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has placed a copy of charge sheet filed by the respondent police before the concerned Court and the said copy is also served on the other side. 2. On going through the charge sheet, Sri Ganesh Nanda, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition. 3. Permission is accorded and the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Needless to say,the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if he is aggrieved by it. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.07.2026 GVK Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 26 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION No: 5139 of 2026 Date: 01.07.2026 GVK