1 CGHC010388272026 2026:CGHC:43387 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5083 of 2026 1 - Madkami Pandu S/o. Hadma, Aged About 67 Years R/o. House No. 34, Ganjenar (Bantupara), Tehsil Chindgarh Kawasiras, P.O. Kodripal District Sukma (C.G.) 2 - Ayata Kawasi, D/o. Mudha, Age About R/o. Village- Ganjenar (Bantupara), Tehsil Chindgarh District Sukma (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Sukma, Diistrict -Sukma (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.) 3 - The Sub- Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar, Chhindgarh, Sukma, Diistrict -Sukma (C.G.) 5 - Station House Officer, Chhindgarh, Sukma, District -Sukma (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, G.A. RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV 2 SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/10/2026 1. By way of this petition, the present petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “1] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in nature of Mandamus, strictly directing the respondent authorities to initiate proceedings with regards to complaints submitted by the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant suitable compensation in lieu of the loss of crops and illegal dispossession of all the petitioners from their agricultural land during the cropping season, in the larger interest of justice. 3] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the imposition of cost upon the respondent authorities responsible to act on receiving the complaints of the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 4] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition. 3 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and there being no objection on behalf of the respondent/State, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi