1 CGHC010394062026 2026:CGHC:43602 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7357 of 2026 Kailash Kumar Kannoje S/o. Late Somnath Kannoje Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Lecturer At Swami Atmanand English Medium School, Sukuldaihan, Block Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 3. Collector, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4. District Education Officer, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5. District Education Officer, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh 6. Swami Atmanand English Medium School, Sukuldaihan, Through Its Principal, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Aniruddh Singh, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Anandi Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 08/10/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was sent on deputation vide order dated 27.09.2023 from Government High School, Vasdi, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki to Swami Atmanand English Medium School, Sukuldaihan, Block Rajnandgaon. He submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation seeking his repatriation to his original place of posting JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.10.08 17:10:47 +0530 2 and the said representation has been forwarded by the Collector, Rajnandgaon, vide letter dated 06.10.2025. He, therefore, submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Secretary, Department of School Education (respondent No. 1), to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) within a stipulated period. 2. Learned State counsel submits that, if the representation submitted by the petitioner is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a period of 50 days. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4), in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent authority shall consider the representation of the petitioner independently, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. S SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti