Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010035912026 2026:GAU-AS:4361 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./524/2026 AMIR HAMZA S/O LT. TALEB ALI R/O SONATARI P.S. TARABARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S ISLAM, S RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./718/2026 BABUL HUSSAIN S/O AMIR ALI VILL- KARIGAON P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R ALI Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 26.03.2026 Heard Mr. S. Islam and Mr. H.A. Ali, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, the Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. Both these applications under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioners, namely- Amir Hamza and Babul Hussain have prayed for releasing them on bail after they were arrested in connection with Boko P.S. Case No.35/2026 under Section 310(4) of BNS, 2023. 3. Hafiz Ali in his FIR dated 08.02.2026 has alleged that on the previous midnight, a vehicle had arrived in his house. The informant went out of the house to see who was coming to his house. At that time, 5/6 numbers of unknown persons came out of the car. Their faces were covered by clothes. On seeing them, the informant Hafiz Ali became scared and started shouting for help. On hearing his screams, those persons entered into their vehicle and ran away. In spite of that, Hafiz Ali had informed police immediately. Next morning, Hafiz Ali came to know that police had arrested those persons who had come to his house in the car. Police also recovered sharp weapons Page No.# 3/3 from their possessions. Hafiz Ali identified the person as Amir Hamza. 4. I have gone through the case diary. 5. The case diary reveals that the present two petitioners are habitual offenders. They commit dacoity regularly in different places. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 7. This Court is of the opinion that both the petitioners do not deserve to be released on bail at this stage, as some other persons involved in this case are still on the run. For the aforesaid reasons, both the bail applications are dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Case diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant