Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38197 (KAR)

SMT GOWRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/43297/2016 · 2026-08-29

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010093512016 NC: 2026:KHC:47187 WP No. 43297 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 43297 OF 2016 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT: NO.221, SINGASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 068 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE AIRCRAFT EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.15, 1ST CROSS C.K.C. GARDEN, K.H.ROAD BENGALURU-560 027 REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. POOJA M. KOORSE, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2; Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010093512016 NC: 2026:KHC:47187 WP No. 43297 of 2016 SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT NO.3;) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.62 MEASURING 1 ACRE 15, SITUATED IN SINGASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, STANDS LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND CONSEQUENTLY HOLD THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN RESPECT ABOVE SAID LAND UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 BY ISSUANCE OF THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION ON 05.09.1988 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION ON 28.09.1989 AT ANNEXURE-B AND C HAS NO LEGAL EFFECT IN THE EYE OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR