Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CWP CWP CWP CWP----28472 28472 28472 28472----2026 2026 2026 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH
127
CWP-28472-2026 Date of decision:03.09.2026
Dr. Ravi Dr. Ravi Dr. Ravi Dr. Ravi
.....Petitioner VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS State of Haryana and others State of Haryana and others State of Haryana and others State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
HON'BLE MR.
HON'BLE MR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : Mr. Parmender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG Haryana.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
**** HARPREET SINGH BRAR HARPREET SINGH BRAR HARPREET SINGH BRAR HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) , J. (Oral) , J. (Oral) , J. (Oral)
1.
This Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 29.07.2026 (Annexure P-22), proposing termination/de-panelment of the petitioner’s services, along with the Inquiry Report dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure P-22) and the modified Inquiry Report dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-23); and for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to protect the petitioner’s continuity of service, teaching workload, remuneration and consequential service benefits, and further directing the respondents to furnish complete and legible copies of the inquiry reports, PARUL VERMA 2026.09.07 09:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
2
CWP CWP CWP CWP----28472 28472 28472 28472----2026 2026 2026 2026
proceedings, witness statements and documents relied upon against the petitioner, as also to conduct a fresh, fair and impartial inquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
2.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate has filed power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.2 to 5, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner has learnt that his services have been terminated and, therefore, he is required to challenge the termination order. As such, at this stage, he wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the termination order and seeking appropriate relief in this regard.
4.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
5.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand
disposed of. 03.09.2026
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) parul verma
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No
PARUL VERMA 2026.09.07 09:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment