HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6187 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri S.P. Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Ms. Tanu Roopanwal, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri Ajal Krishna, Advocate for Respondent-5. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners is not able to show any specific averment or provision of law which could support the prayer of petitioner. 3. Still in the interest of justice, the writ petition is disposed of that in case petitioner is able to show by way of a fresh representation any substantive position of law and fact, then only concerned respondent will consider their claim to grant pay scale of a particular post. May 6, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Prakash Singh, Sumit Singh, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajal Krishna, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Rajeev Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad