1 CGHC010363792026 2026:CGHC:43285 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4900 of 2026 1 - Ashok Kumar Chandra S/o Late Shri Dular Sai Chandra, Aged About 41 Years R/o Milan Chowk, Hasaud, Tahsil Hasaud, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, C.G. 2 - Collector, Office Of The Collector, District - Sakti (C.G.) 3 - The Sub - Divisional Officer, Office Of The Sub - Divisional Officer, Sakti, District - Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar, Office Of The Tahsildar, Tahsil Hasoud, District Sakti, C.G. 5 - The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Concerned Division (Mironi Barrage), District Sakti, C.G. ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV 2 06/10/2026 1. By way of this petition, the present petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ, order directing to the respondents to release and pay the lawful compensation to the petitioner in respect of the acquired land bearing Khasra Nos. 802, 788, 785, 783 and 780/2, along with all consequential statutory benefits, in accordance with law. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased direct the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 09.07.2026 submitted by the petitioner within a time bound manner and grant compensation with Interest of 9% per annum from the date of taking possession till expiry of one year; and Interest of 15% per annum thereafter till actual payment of the entire compensation amount, with the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, upon receipt of the documents, it has been found that the petitioner is required to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, he seeks permission of this Court to 3 withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and there being no objection on behalf of the respondent/State, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi