213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3848-2026 Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026 Ashwani Kumar ....Petitioner Vs. Mukul Kumar, Director, Urban Local Bodies Department, Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana for respondent No. 1. Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advocate for Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. Status report by way of affidavit filed by learned counsel representing respondents No. 2 to 5 and same is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Along with status report, learned counsel has annexed the order (Annexure A-1) passed in CM-6028-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-2469- 2026, whereby interim order has been passed in the same terms and it was to be heard with LPA-939-2026. Order passed in LPA-939-2026 dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure R-2) also placed on record where in that case respondent No. 1 Ajeet Singh stated that no contempt petition shall be filed and consideration on stay application was deferred. 2. Aforesaid factual position clearly indicates that LPA is pending and interim order in the same terms has been passed in present case bearing CWP-17552-2017 decided vide order dated 09.09.2025 LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3848-2026 -2- (Annexure P-1). At present, no further action is required in this case. Therefore, contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of, with liberty to petitioner to revive the same if need so arises. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 10.09.2026 lalit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document