Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38171 (CHH)

KHILESHWAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4941/2026 · 2026-09-28

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010380942026 2026:CGHC:42293 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4941 of 2026 Khileshwar Sahu S/o Shri Prahlad Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o 07, Rajendra Nagar, Ward No. 15, Vtc, Dantewada (Np), Po Dantewada, District-Dakshin Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) Pin - 494449 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Through The Secretary, Add - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Janta Colony, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pin 492001 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Bhanushali, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/09/2026 1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records from the 2 petitioner, pertaining to the case of petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents, more particularly directing the respondent no. 2 to consider petitioner’s pending representation/application dated 19.05.2026 and decide it in a stipulated period of time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation/application dated 19.05.2026 before respondent No. 2, which is pending consideration. He submits that despite the representation having been filed, no decision has been taken thereon till date. He, therefore, prays that a suitable direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the pending representation/application dated 19.05.2026 within a stipulated period, in accordance with law. 3. Learned State Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the pending representation/application dated 19.05.2026 of the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law, within such time as may be fixed by this Court. He further submits that an appropriate decision shall be taken on the representation without being influenced by any observation made by this Court. 3 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the relief sought by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the parties, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Madhurima