Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3816 (JHR)

SAHIL RAZA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1046/2026 · 2026-03-25

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8440 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1046 of 2026 1. Sahil Raza, aged about 20 yrs, S/o- Imtiaz Ansari 2. Afsar Waris, aged about 21 yrs, S/o- Md. Asger All residents of village- Pipra, P.O. + P.S.- Charhi, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, APP --- 06/25.03.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 09.10.2025 in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025, registered under Sections 310(2), 324(5), 324(6) and 326(f) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of Arms Act, now pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that neither the petitioners are named in the First Information Report nor there is any recovery from them and no Test Identification Parade (TIP) has been conducted. He has further submitted that the petitioners have been remanded in the present case while they were in custody in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025 and except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioners have one case against them of similar nature. He submits that the allegations are serious in nature. 5. However, it is not in dispute even from the side of the State that there is no recovery either from the petitioners or on the confessional statement of the petitioners. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners are 2026:JHHC:8440 2 directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribagh in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relatives. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:25.03.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.03.2026