OD-1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APDT/22/2026 WITH CS/357/2013 IA NO: GA/1/2026 MR.PRADIP KEJRIWAL VS SUBHAM AGARWAL AND ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARYAK DUTT Date : September 3, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Shounak Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Mrinal Das, Adv. …for the appellant. Mr. Rajarshi Dutta, Adv.(VC) Mr. ShayakMitra, Adv. Ms. Manisha Das, Adv. …for respondent no. 1. Mr. SourajitDasgupta, Adv. Mr. S. Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Vishwarup Acharya, Adv. …for Gita Khosla. The Court: Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated January 10, 2024 passed in CS No. 357 of 2013. Appeal is at the behest of one of the defendants in the suit. A money decree was passed by the impugned judgment and decree against the defendants to the suit which includes the appellant. There is a delay in making and filing the appeal. Delay is to the extent of 921 days. 2 Department reports that, the appeal was filed with deficit Court fees. Appellant is yet to put in the Court fees of Rs.23,880/- for the purpose of the present appeal. Noticing such fact, we permitted the appellant time to put in the deficit Court fees. Today learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, the appellant is unable to put in the deficit Court fees for the appeal. Plaintiff and one of the defendants in the suit are represented. Since, the appellant is not in a position to put in the deficit Court fees, APDT/22/2026 along with connected application are dismissed. (DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) (ARYAK DUTT, J.) KB AR (CR)