HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5480 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one appears on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Even though, the name of Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh is duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither he nor any one on his behalf is present to press this writ petition, even in revised call. 4. Learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1, 2 & 3 is present. 5. Though, names of Mr. Brijesh Singh and Mr. Sushil Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel representing first informant-respndnet-4 is duly published in the cause list, however, neither they nor any one on their behalf is present to oppose this writ petition, even in revised call. 6. As no one appears on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition, even in revised call, it is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 12, 2026 Vinay Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Brijesh Singh, G.A., Sushil Kumar Shukla (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Smt. Anita Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad