1 CGHC010251622021 2026:CGHC:42327 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4089 of 2021 1 - Habibuddin Musalman S/o Late Shri Nabiyuddin Aged About 49 Years Presently Working As Mutwalli, At Jama Maszid, Muslim Jamat Podi, Thana Bodla, Tehsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. R/o House No. 97, Musalman Mohalla, Tehsil- Bodla District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - President Chhattisgarh Revenue Board, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner Division Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - Additional Commissioner Division- Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bodla Tehsil- Bodla, Distric- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 7 - Tehsildar Bodla Tehsil- Bodla, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 8 - Mobinuddin Musalman S/o Late Shri Rafiyuddin Occupation- Kastkar R/o Sakin Podi, Thana- Bodla, Tehsil- Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the case. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside/quashed the impugned order Dated 23.11.2020 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the President Chhattisgarh Revenue Board Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief to the petitioner which this Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat