Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38092 (PAT)

Dinanath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/650/2017 · 2026-01-05

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.650 of 2017 ====================================================== Dinanath Yadav son of Rambaran Yadav, Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Brahampur, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Registrar, Co-operative Society, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Joint Secretary, Co-operative Society, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. District Co-operative Officer, Buxar, District- Buxar. 4. Assistant Registrar, C-operative Society, Dumraon, District- Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 5 05-01-2026 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs :- “(i) For issuance of writ of mandamus commanding the respondent authority to take decision to regularise the service of petitioner who is working on the post of Night Guard, Bayapar Mandal, Raghunathpur, Distt. Buxar from his joining July 1984. (ii) For issuance of writ of Mandamus Patna High Court CWJC No.650 of 2017(5) dt.05-01-2026 2/3 commanding the respondent authority to adjust the service of petitioner transfering him from the department of Co-operative to ther department on the post for which petitioner is entitled for as per his qualification. (iii) For issuance of such other appropriate writ or direction which may deem fit and proper for the ends of justice.” 3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last two dates i.e. 14.11.2024 and 5.8.2025 also when the following orders were recorded :- “14-11-2024 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Re-notify this case on 06.02.2025. … … … … … … … … … … … … .. .. 05-08-2025 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, Learned Counsel for the State is present. 2. It transpires from Order No.3 dated 14.11.2024 also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. As a matter of last indulgence, this case is adjourned for two weeks. 4. List this case on 02.09.2025. If on the said date, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, appropriate order shall be passed.” Patna High Court CWJC No.650 of 2017(5) dt.05-01-2026 3/3 4. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner for the third consecutive date, the case is dismissed for non- prosecution. avinash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U