Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010464702015 NC: 2026:KHC:47860 RSA No. 1866 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1866 OF 2015 (DEC) BETWEEN:
1. JAYAMMA D/O. LATE. BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT REDDIHALLI VILLAGE, MANDIKAL HOBLI, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK
2. NARAYANAMMA D/O. LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT VALASENAHALLI, BASETTIHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK
3. BYRAMMA D/O. LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT VADDAHALLI VILLAGE, SADALI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SUBBA REDDY K N., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010464702015 NC: 2026:KHC:47860 RSA No. 1866 of 2015
AND:
1.
SMT.BYYAMMA DEAD BY LR
G.N. VENKATAREDDY, S/O. NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT GOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK
2. MUNIYAMMA W/O. LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT GOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
3.
G.B. RATHNAMMA D/O. BYRAPPA W/O. LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT GOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (NOC) SRI. R D PANCHAM, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC.., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.09.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.10/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHICKBALLAPUR (SITTING AT CHINTAMANI), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMED THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2004 PASSED IN O.S.NO.150/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DVN.) & J.M.F.C., CHINTHAMANI.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010464702015 NC: 2026:KHC:47860 RSA No. 1866 of 2015
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT
1.
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo dated 10.08.2026 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the instant appeal.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of the disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for
consideration and are accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4