02.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 291. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1745 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Jagaddal PS Case No. 510 of 2022 dated 12.08.2022 under sections 363/365/366A/368/370A/372/376(2)(i)(m) of Indian Penal code and sections 3/4/5/6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and section 6/17 of the POCSO Act, 2012. And In the matter of : Rahul Biswas @ Hablu ……Petitioner. Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Mr. Gourab Kumar Nath ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Tamal Singha Roy Mr. Manmohan Singh Roop Roy ….for the Defacto Complainant. Ms. Sanjana Jha ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and there have been no charges, even the victim did not depose against her while being examined in Court. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate for the State has referred to the relevant part of the evidence of the victim which reflects that 2 the petitioner was involved in using the victim and getting a share of the money out of the same. Having considered the role of the petitioner in the nature of trade complained of, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail in spite of his detention for more than 4 years. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 1745 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)